Resize Text
Tier 1 ยท The normative floor
Baseline compliance
What the normative text of WCAG 2.2 requires, and nothing more. Only a failure of this tier is a WCAG failure.
The bare minimum
Apart from captions and images of text, text can be resized up to 200 percent without assistive technology and without loss of content or functionality.
Normative text
Verbatim from WCAG 2.2, W3C Recommendation 12 December 2024. Underlined terms are defined below.
Except for captions and images of text, text can be resized without assistive technology up to 200 percent without loss of content or functionality.
Not required by the normative text
Common claims that this criterion does not support. Don't log these as WCAG failures.
- On-page text-size controls. Browser zoom is a way to resize text.
- Resizing beyond 200 percent.
Definitions used (4)
Glossary definitions are normative. Their notes are informative.
- captions
-
synchronized visual and/or text alternative for both speech and non-speech audio information needed to understand the media content
Informative notes (6)
Captions are similar to dialogue-only subtitles except captions convey not only the content of spoken dialogue, but also equivalents for non-dialogue audio information needed to understand the program content, including sound effects, music, laughter, speaker identification and location.
Closed Captions are equivalents that can be turned on and off with some players.
Open Captions are any captions that cannot be turned off. For example, if the captions are visual equivalent images of text embedded in video.
Captions should not obscure or obstruct relevant information in the video.
In some countries, captions are called subtitles.
Audio descriptions can be, but do not need to be, captioned since they are descriptions of information that is already presented visually.
- image of text
-
text that has been rendered in a non-text form (e.g., an image) in order to achieve a particular visual effect
Informative notes (1)
This does not include text that is part of a picture that contains significant other visual content.
- text
-
sequence of characters that can be programmatically determined, where the sequence is expressing something in human language
- assistive technology
-
hardware and/or software that acts as a user agent, or along with a mainstream user agent, to provide functionality to meet the requirements of users with disabilities that go beyond those offered by mainstream user agents
Informative notes (3)
Functionality provided by assistive technology includes alternative presentations (e.g., as synthesized speech or magnified content), alternative input methods (e.g., voice), additional navigation or orientation mechanisms, and content transformations (e.g., to make tables more accessible).
Assistive technologies often communicate data and messages with mainstream user agents by using and monitoring APIs.
The distinction between mainstream user agents and assistive technologies is not absolute. Many mainstream user agents provide some features to assist individuals with disabilities. The basic difference is that mainstream user agents target broad and diverse audiences that usually include people with and without disabilities. Assistive technologies target narrowly defined populations of users with specific disabilities. The assistance provided by an assistive technology is more specific and appropriate to the needs of its target users. The mainstream user agent may provide important functionality to assistive technologies like retrieving web content from program objects or parsing markup into identifiable bundles.
Tier 2 ยท The gap
Usability & user impact
Where content can meet this criterion and still make things harder for people with disabilities. These are not failures of SC 1.4.4, so raise them as usability defects. Known failures, including failures of related criteria, are listed in Tier 1.
Many people enlarge only the text, through browser or OS font settings rather than zoom. Layouts with fixed heights can clip that text even when they pass with page zoom.
Tier 3 ยท The golden path
Recommended best practice
The pattern that meets the floor, closes the gap, and avoids audit disputes. A recommendation, not a requirement.
Size text and its containers in relative units, and test with browser text-size settings as well as zoom.
W3C's Understanding document and techniques for SC 1.4.4 โ are informative: sufficient techniques show ways to pass, and documented failures show common ways to fail, but neither changes what the criterion requires.
How SC 1.4.4 maps to the WCAG 3 draft
From this site's reviewed map to the WCAG 3 editor's draft. It's an interpretation: W3C has not published a mapping.
Successor provisions
From WCAG 2.2, section 5.1: โThe main content of WCAG 2.2 is normative and defines requirements that impact conformance claims. Introductory material, appendices, sections marked as "non-normative", diagrams, examples, and notes are informative (non-normative). Non-normative material provides advisory information to help interpret the guidelines but does not create requirements that impact a conformance claim.โ