WCAG 3.0 is an active W3C Working Draft in development by the AGWG. Requirements, assertions, the conformance model and reporting tiers are still being developed and may change. The latest published draft is the 10 September 2026 Working Draft; this site follows the editors’ draft, which also includes exploratory provisions.
An organisational assertion: the organisation states that it reviewed its audio descriptions, and records who reviewed them and when.
Why It Matters
Descriptions produced at volume, or automatically, drift from what the picture actually shows. A recorded review is the check that they still match.
0
Examples from the Draft
Worked examples the W3C editors wrote into the provision itself, not
examples invented here.
Roles and numbers: 3 creators
1 director
1 planner
1 screenwriter/playwright
Period: 10-21 October 2024
Examples of fixed issues:
Provided more details based on feedback.
Rewrote some scripts to reflect the director’s intent.
Added the description of the background shown in the video.
Test Procedure from the W3C Draft
Upstream has a test heading for this provision but has not written
the procedure yet, and no test steps have been written here.
Generic advice would apply to almost any provision, so none is shown.
W3C Working Group Status
W3C Maturity Status:developing
Track / Group:images-and-media
The draft records no open editors' notes on this provision.
W3C Threads on This Provision
No GitHub issue in w3c/wcag3 carries this provision's label, so there
is no recorded discussion to show. Cross-cutting threads that name no
provision are listed on the
Discussions page.
WCAG 2.2 Criteria That Map Here
From this site's reviewed WCAG 2.2 → WCAG 3 map. The map is
an interpretation, not a W3C mapping: W3C has not published one yet.
No mapping recorded. No WCAG 2.2 criterion in
this site's map is recorded as a predecessor of this provision.
[Title, role, or organization] asserts that:
* We have reviewed the audio descriptions.
::assertion-required
* title, role, or organization making the assertion (if different from the conformance claim)
* date of the review
* date of assertion (if different from the date of the conformance claim)
::assertion-recommended
* role of the creator
* number of creators (for each Role)
* date (Period) of review
* examples of fixed issues based on the review
:::example
* **Roles and numbers:** 3 creators
* 1 director
* 1 planner
* 1 screenwriter/playwright
* **Period:** 10-21 October 2024
* **Examples of fixed issues:**
* Provided more details based on feedback.
* Rewrote some scripts to reflect the director's intent.
* Added the description of the background shown in the video.
:::